![]() |
Remote access without exposing ports on firewall? - Printable Version +- Jellyfin Forum (https://forum.jellyfin.org) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.jellyfin.org/f-support) +--- Forum: General Questions (https://forum.jellyfin.org/f-general-questions) +--- Thread: Remote access without exposing ports on firewall? (/t-remote-access-without-exposing-ports-on-firewall) |
Remote access without exposing ports on firewall? - watchDominionDotOrg - 2025-04-17 Thinking something like Tailscale / ZeroTier, but still maintaining the remote connection type so it's not considered a LAN device with unlimited bandwidth. Has anyone tried this and did you run into any issues along the way? RE: Remote access without exposing ports on firewall? - TheDreadPirate - 2025-04-17 By default, the address space used by Tailscale is not considered "local". If you WANTED the Tailscale addresses to be considered local, you would add "100.64.0.0./10" to the "LAN Networks" field in Jellyfin. |