![]() |
Was there any reason the multi-part movie merge logic was updated? - Printable Version +- Jellyfin Forum (https://forum.jellyfin.org) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.jellyfin.org/f-support) +--- Forum: General Questions (https://forum.jellyfin.org/f-general-questions) +--- Thread: Was there any reason the multi-part movie merge logic was updated? (/t-was-there-any-reason-the-multi-part-movie-merge-logic-was-updated) |
Was there any reason the multi-part movie merge logic was updated? - sxales - 2024-07-02 It appears between 10.8.13 and 10.9.7 the logic that merged multi-part movies was updated. As a result, A,B,C suffixes no longer merge. In 10.8.13, the following movie with multiple parts are merged into a single movie (with additional parts). Title (Year)/TitleA.mkv Title (Year)/TitleB.mkv Title (Year)/TitleA.nfo Title (Year)/TitleA-poster.jpg Title (Year)/TitleA-fanart.jpg In 10,9.7, TitleA shows up Title (Year) with metadata but TitleB lists separately with no metadata. I don't see anything mentioned in the change log or a recent issue to explain why this change was made. Is this just an undocumented change in behavior going forward, or was this unintentional? RE: Was there any reason the multi-part movie merge logic was updated? - theguymadmax - 2024-07-02 The change was in the initial 10.9.0 release. Here is the pull request explaining the changes. Basically there should have been a space after the movie followed by (parttype) in the naming structure. This was being ignored by the file stacking rules, now it's enforced. So in your case it should be: Title (Year)/Title partA.mkv Title (Year)/Title partB.mkv RE: Was there any reason the multi-part movie merge logic was updated? - sxales - 2024-07-02 I love when people change behavior that has been in the system for years because they don't like the way it looks. Now I get to go rename a couple of hundred files. |