Swiftfin / Infuse Not Adhering to Bandwidth Limit - Printable Version +- Jellyfin Forum (https://forum.jellyfin.org) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.jellyfin.org/f-support) +--- Forum: Troubleshooting (https://forum.jellyfin.org/f-troubleshooting) +--- Thread: Swiftfin / Infuse Not Adhering to Bandwidth Limit (/t-swiftfin-infuse-not-adhering-to-bandwidth-limit) |
Swiftfin / Infuse Not Adhering to Bandwidth Limit - JazoBurbs - 2024-12-24 With the holidays comes an influx in questions from my users. I’ve noticed that both Swift & Infuse very inconsistently adhere to both user-level and global-level bandwidth limits. I get that these apps are focused on Direct Play and that they don’t have options to adjust quality. Instead of using the official JellyFin App on tvOS (or StreamyFin on iPhone), I was looking to force transcoding on specific users but this doesn’t happen most of the time. Can someone else either validate this or provide suggestions to further test and get this to work. There really just isn’t a perfect tvOS app out there for remote users that prioritizes streaming experience over quality. Really waiting for StreamyFin tvOS or Infuse to support quality selection. Thanks! RE: Swiftfin / Infuse Not Adhering to Bandwidth Limit - TheDreadPirate - 2024-12-24 IIRC, Infuse will directly access the file with the Jellyfin download API, circumventing bit rate limits. Swiftfin SHOULD be using the playback API and honoring any limits set. Both global and user specific. As long as the user's address is detected as "remote". RE: Swiftfin / Infuse Not Adhering to Bandwidth Limit - JazoBurbs - 2024-12-24 Thanks! Re Infuse - Got it. I know there’s a lot of discussion around improvements there as far as user selected quality/transcoding. Respecting server settings would be a good bare minimum. Re SwiftFin. Thanks for confirming. It seems to be inconsistent for sure. I’m using Tailscale but have tailnet IP set as remote in the server settings so it should treat any Tailscale connection as remote. |