|
2024-05-11, 12:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 2024-05-11, 12:50 PM by sinholueiro. Edited 1 time in total.)
Hello all. I am planning in change my home server. I have an i5 8400 and I will change it for an i5 14600K. Do you know if Quicksync benefits for having more memory bandwidth? Because I can pair the i5 with DDR4 or DDR5. DDR4 is cheaper, but I could think of getting DDR5 if performance is better. Have anyone tested this? Thanks!
2024-05-11, 04:27 PM
Quicksync, AFAIK, does not benefit from VRAM size nor bandwidth for transcoding performance. TONE MAPPING is a different story. It benefits greatly from more VRAM.
Jellyfin 10.10.1 (Docker)
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Intel i3 12100 Intel Arc A380 OS drive - SK Hynix P41 1TB Storage 3x WD Red Pro 6TB CMR in RAIDZ1 (JF Library) ![[Image: GitHub%20Sponsors-grey?logo=github]](https://img.shields.io/badge/GitHub%20Sponsors-grey?logo=github){kind=icon}
2024-05-11, 04:42 PM
(2024-05-11, 04:27 PM)TheDreadPirate Wrote: Quicksync, AFAIK, does not benefit from VRAM size nor bandwidth for transcoding performance. TONE MAPPING is a different story. It benefits greatly from more VRAM. It makes sense, isn't tonemapping done in GPU cores? So more bandwidth is more performance. I guess I will keep my DDR4, then. Thanks!
2024-05-11, 05:49 PM
Tone mapping uses openCL, so yes GPU cores.
Jellyfin 10.10.1 (Docker)
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Intel i3 12100 Intel Arc A380 OS drive - SK Hynix P41 1TB Storage 3x WD Red Pro 6TB CMR in RAIDZ1 (JF Library)
|
|
|
|
|
