2024-08-27, 11:11 PM
Appreciate the response - I may have to give that a go. Starlink does use CGNAT I'm afraid!
I have numerous other services running over the Tailscale VPN Without issue, however they probably aren't as sensitive to packet loss. I'm no Dev but I did some quick research on that specific error, it seems to be generated when an outgoing port cannot be bound to an IP address supplied, I.E If the Tailscale NIC on the server disconnects for whatever reason. I'll pay more attention to the Tailscale Logs at the same time as the dropouts to see if I can correlate any issues with Tailscale. To my knowledge Tailscale uses Wireguard technology so in theory should be working without issue. I guess the key difference here is I'm not running my own Reverse Proxy & Wireguard instance.
I have numerous other services running over the Tailscale VPN Without issue, however they probably aren't as sensitive to packet loss. I'm no Dev but I did some quick research on that specific error, it seems to be generated when an outgoing port cannot be bound to an IP address supplied, I.E If the Tailscale NIC on the server disconnects for whatever reason. I'll pay more attention to the Tailscale Logs at the same time as the dropouts to see if I can correlate any issues with Tailscale. To my knowledge Tailscale uses Wireguard technology so in theory should be working without issue. I guess the key difference here is I'm not running my own Reverse Proxy & Wireguard instance.