2025-04-26, 03:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 2025-04-26, 03:46 PM by bitstream. Edited 1 time in total.)
After testing the DLNA plugin with various clients and comparing it to Synology, my conclusion is:
- it only offers a reduced feature set, even basic features are missing.
- performance is slow
- signifantly worse compared to the DLNA implementation in Synology
Bottom line, it's only usable if you don't need more than pick a song an play it. Otherwise would will have to work with playlists, which you start and let run without skipping or repeating.
I didn't had a look at the code, however in the github repo I couldn't detect a lot of activities. It rather seems the plugin has been left back to die in peace.
- it only offers a reduced feature set, even basic features are missing.
- performance is slow
- signifantly worse compared to the DLNA implementation in Synology
Bottom line, it's only usable if you don't need more than pick a song an play it. Otherwise would will have to work with playlists, which you start and let run without skipping or repeating.
I didn't had a look at the code, however in the github repo I couldn't detect a lot of activities. It rather seems the plugin has been left back to die in peace.