• Login
  • Register
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username/Email:
    Password:
    Or login with a social network below
  • Forum
  • Website
  • GitHub
  • Status
  • Translation
  • Features
  • Team
  • Rules
  • Help
  • Feeds
User Links
  • Login
  • Register
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username/Email:
    Password:
    Or login with a social network below

    Useful Links Forum Website GitHub Status Translation Features Team Rules Help Feeds
    Jellyfin Forum Support General Questions [closed] Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU

     
    • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

    [closed] Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU

    Outcome: Shifting video to iGPU works well, still load on CPU remains significant
    bitstream
    Offline

    Junior Member

    Posts: 25
    Threads: 6
    Joined: 2025 Apr
    Reputation: 0
    #2
    2025-05-27, 05:43 PM (This post was last modified: 2025-05-27, 05:53 PM by bitstream. Edited 2 times in total.)
    Just did a test on the cli directly feeding ffmpeg with the same file i tested above, however without streaming of course. So the runtime is not directly comparable to the results above but the difference between the runtime of the test without hardware acc and with hardware acc is comprable.

    without hardware acc:
    time ffmpeg -i /nas/test.avi -c:v libx264 -f null - 
    real    8m11.390s
    user    30m8.818s
    sys    0m45.056s

    with hardware acc:
    time ffmpeg -hwaccel vaapi -vaapi_device /dev/dri/renderD128 -i /nas/test.avi -vf 'format=nv12,hwupload' -c:v h264_vaapi  -f null -
    real    2m49.731s
    user    1m41.904s
    sys    0m11.403s

    The relevant duration is "user" (that's duration times cpu cores used). The difference is massive: The encoding has used 18x less cpu time and the whole processes finished 4.5x faster using the iGPU compared to no hardware acceleration.

    This would have been the factors i was expecting to see in JF aswell. Why is there such a big difference? I'm aware that there is also audio transconding and pot. sub titles burn-in (not the case here), but compare to video processing, thes tasks seem to consume rather low cpu power.
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


    Messages In This Thread
    [closed] Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by bitstream - 2025-05-27, 03:52 PM
    RE: Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by bitstream - 2025-05-27, 05:43 PM
    RE: Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by bitstream - 2025-05-27, 07:10 PM
    RE: Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by nyanmisaka - 2025-05-28, 12:57 AM
    RE: Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by bitstream - 2025-05-29, 10:25 PM
    RE: Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by bitstream - 2025-05-29, 10:47 PM
    RE: Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by bitstream - 2025-06-06, 11:42 AM
    RE: [closed] Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by williamthrilliam - 2025-06-28, 01:13 PM
    RE: [closed] Transcoding on i3-N305 / iGPU - by goerdi - 2025-06-30, 11:20 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread
    Forum Jump:

    Home · Team · Help · Contact
    © Designed by D&D - Powered by MyBB
    L


    Jellyfin

    The Free Software Media System

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode